Mark Lajal vs Sebastian Korda Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Mark Lajal and Sebastian Korda have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Mark Lajal: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Mark Lajal holds a 4-7 record (36.4%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 18 times, winning 6 (33.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Mark Lajal has posted a 46-26 record (63.9% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Mark Lajal holds a record of 1-2 (33.3%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 147-81 (64.5%) on hard, 13-13 (50.0%) on clay, and 3-3 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-1 (50.0%) on grass and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 30-13 (69.8%) on hard, 6-3 (66.7%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Mark Lajal has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Mark Lajal serves an average of 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 5.5.

Sebastian Korda: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Sebastian Korda holds a 5-2 record (71.4%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 200 times, winning 120 (60.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Sebastian Korda has posted a 24-19 record (55.8% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Sebastian Korda holds a record of 99-64 (60.7%) on hard, 28-24 (53.8%) on clay, and 16-9 (64.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 17-14 (54.8%) on hard and 5-5 (50.0%) on clay at ATP level. Sebastian Korda has won two ATP tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). He has also won two titles at Challenger/ITF level (both on hard). Sebastian Korda is currently serving 8.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (43 matches), up from a career average of 6.6.