Matej Dodig vs Moez Echargui Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Matej Dodig and Moez Echargui have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Matej Dodig: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Matej Dodig holds a 36-29 record (55.4%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 222 times, winning 137 (61.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Matej Dodig has posted a 37-29 record (56.1% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Matej Dodig holds a record of 1-2 (33.3%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 97-57 (63.0%) on clay and 35-23 (60.3%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 18-13 (58.1%) on clay and 17-11 (60.7%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Matej Dodig has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on clay and one on hard). Matej Dodig is currently serving 5.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (66 matches), up from a career average of 4.4.

Moez Echargui: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Moez Echargui holds a 37-24 record (60.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 613 times, winning 355 (57.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 2-8 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Moez Echargui has posted a 38-32 record (54.3% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Moez Echargui holds a record of 0-3 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 217-129 (62.7%) on hard, 127-123 (50.8%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-3 on hard at ATP level. 27-10 (73.0%) on hard, 4-8 (33.3%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Moez Echargui has won 15 titles at Challenger/ITF level (14 on hard and one on clay). Moez Echargui is currently serving 4.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (70 matches), up from a career average of 3.3.