Maya Joint vs Rebecca Sramkova Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Maya Joint and Rebecca Sramkova have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Maya Joint: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Maya Joint holds a 10-3 record (76.9%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 151 times, winning 104 (68.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 1-9 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Maya Joint has posted a 24-26 record (48.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Maya Joint holds a record of 24-26 (48.0%) on hard, 6-6 (50.0%) on clay, and 5-2 (71.4%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 16-18 (47.1%) on hard, 5-2 (71.4%) on grass, and 0-3 on clay at WTA level. Maya Joint has won two WTA tour-level titles (one on clay and one on grass). She has also won two titles at Challenger/ITF level (both on hard). Maya Joint serves an average of 1.6 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.4.

Rebecca Sramkova: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Rebecca Sramkova holds a 10-16 record (38.5%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 111 times, winning 52 (46.8%). Rebecca Sramkova has lost her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Rebecca Sramkova has posted a 25-31 record (44.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Rebecca Sramkova holds a record of 35-33 (51.5%) on hard, 8-12 (40.0%) on clay, and 5-5 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 9-15 (37.5%) on hard, 1-2 (33.3%) on grass, and 0-1 on clay at WTA level. Rebecca Sramkova has won one WTA tour-level title on hard. She has also won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (nine on clay and four on hard). Rebecca Sramkova is currently serving 3.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 3.1.