Mirra Andreeva vs Naomi Osaka Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Mirra Andreeva and Naomi Osaka have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Mirra Andreeva: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Mirra Andreeva holds a 7-5 record (58.3%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 20 36 times, winning 20 (55.6%). Mirra Andreeva has lost her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Mirra Andreeva has posted a 40-16 record (71.4% win rate). Her last match was 2 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Mirra Andreeva holds a record of 48-23 (67.6%) on hard, 33-11 (75.0%) on clay, and 8-6 (57.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 24-9 (72.7%) on hard, 11-4 (73.3%) on clay, and 5-3 (62.5%) on grass at WTA level. Mirra Andreeva has won three WTA tour-level titles (two on hard and one on clay). She has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and two on hard). Mirra Andreeva is currently serving 3.0 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 2.5.

Naomi Osaka: Against top 10 players in the last 52 weeks, Naomi Osaka holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 10 43 times, winning 14 (32.6%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Naomi Osaka has posted a 35-15 record (70.0% win rate). Her last match was 2 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Naomi Osaka holds a record of 170-78 (68.5%) on hard, 29-24 (54.7%) on clay, and 17-15 (53.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 24-9 (72.7%) on hard, 3-3 (50.0%) on clay, and 3-3 (50.0%) on grass at WTA level. Naomi Osaka has won seven WTA tour-level titles (all on hard), including four Grand Slam titles (all on hard). Naomi Osaka is currently serving 6.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (50 matches), up from a career average of 5.8.