Panna Udvardy vs Yeon Woo Ku Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Panna Udvardy and Yeon Woo Ku have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Panna Udvardy: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Panna Udvardy holds a 39-18 record (68.4%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 499 times, winning 306 (61.3%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Panna Udvardy has posted a 45-32 record (58.4% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Panna Udvardy holds a record of 15-20 (42.9%) on clay, 5-13 (27.8%) on hard, and 3-6 (33.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 221-124 (64.1%) on clay and 58-43 (57.4%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 11-7 (61.1%) on clay, 3-4 (42.9%) on hard, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass at WTA level. 18-12 (60.0%) on clay and 6-2 (75.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Panna Udvardy has won 14 titles at Challenger/ITF level (13 on clay and one on hard). Panna Udvardy serves an average of 2.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.5.

Yeon Woo Ku: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Yeon Woo Ku holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 4 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Yeon Woo Ku has posted a 44-25 record (63.8% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Yeon Woo Ku holds a record of 0-2 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 183-99 (64.9%) on hard, 24-13 (64.9%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 43-19 (69.4%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Yeon Woo Ku has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Yeon Woo Ku serves an average of 0.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 0.9.