Harriet Dart vs Zeynep Sonmez Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Harriet Dart and Zeynep Sonmez have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Harriet Dart: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Harriet Dart holds a 2-5 record (28.6%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 138 times, winning 44 (31.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Harriet Dart has posted a 37-23 record (61.7% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Harriet Dart holds a record of 23-28 (45.1%) on grass, 21-41 (33.9%) on hard, and 0-8 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 155-90 (63.3%) on hard, 17-19 (47.2%) on grass, and 11-12 (47.8%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 1-4 (20.0%) on grass and 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 31-14 (68.9%) on hard and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Harriet Dart has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Harriet Dart serves an average of 1.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.0.

Zeynep Sonmez: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Zeynep Sonmez holds a 20-6 record (76.9%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 343 times, winning 217 (63.3%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Zeynep Sonmez has posted a 36-26 record (58.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Zeynep Sonmez holds a record of 21-20 (51.2%) on hard, 6-5 (54.5%) on grass, and 5-10 (33.3%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 11-13 (45.8%) on hard, 5-3 (62.5%) on grass, and 4-4 (50.0%) on clay at WTA level. Zeynep Sonmez has won one WTA tour-level title on hard. She has also won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (three on hard and one on clay). Zeynep Sonmez serves an average of 0.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 0.6.