Jannik Sinner vs Vitaliy Sachko Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jannik Sinner and Vitaliy Sachko have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Jannik Sinner: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jannik Sinner holds a 8-0 record (100.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 157 times, winning 121 (77.1%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jannik Sinner has posted a 77-7 record (91.7% win rate). His last match was 2 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Jannik Sinner holds a record of 225-51 (81.5%) on hard, 83-25 (76.9%) on clay, and 29-10 (74.4%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 51-5 (91.1%) on hard, 18-1 (94.7%) on clay, and 8-1 (88.9%) on grass at ATP level. Jannik Sinner has won 28 ATP tour-level titles (22 on hard, four on clay, and two on grass), including four Grand Slam titles (three on hard and one on grass). Jannik Sinner is currently serving 7.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (84 matches), up from a career average of 6.0.

Vitaliy Sachko: Throughout his career, he has competed against top 10 2 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Vitaliy Sachko has won his last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Vitaliy Sachko has posted a 26-30 record (46.4% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Vitaliy Sachko holds a record of 3-4 (42.9%) on hard and 0-4 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 152-131 (53.7%) on clay and 96-74 (56.5%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 3-1 (75.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 16-12 (57.1%) on clay and 2-6 (25.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Vitaliy Sachko has won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (two on clay and one on hard). Vitaliy Sachko serves an average of 3.6 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 3.2.