Karolina Pliskova vs Olga Danilovic Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Karolina Pliskova and Olga Danilovic have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Karolina Pliskova: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Karolina Pliskova holds a 5-5 record (50.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 400 times, winning 272 (68.0%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Karolina Pliskova has posted a 20-11 record (64.5% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Karolina Pliskova holds a record of 284-155 (64.7%) on hard, 83-56 (59.7%) on clay, and 56-31 (64.4%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 9-3 (75.0%) on clay, 5-2 (71.4%) on grass, and 4-3 (57.1%) on hard at WTA level. Karolina Pliskova has won 17 WTA tour-level titles (11 on hard, three on clay, and three on grass). Karolina Pliskova is currently serving 3.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (31 matches), down from a career average of 6.8.

Olga Danilovic: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Olga Danilovic holds a 4-9 record (30.8%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 102 times, winning 46 (45.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Olga Danilovic has posted a 8-10 record (44.4% win rate). Her last match was 4 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Olga Danilovic holds a record of 31-18 (63.3%) on clay, 19-26 (42.2%) on hard, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 7-8 (46.7%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass at WTA level. Olga Danilovic has won two WTA tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). She has also won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (seven on clay and one on hard). Olga Danilovic is currently serving 4.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (18 matches), up from a career average of 3.1.