Liam Draxl vs Lukas Neumayer Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Liam Draxl and Lukas Neumayer have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Liam Draxl: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Liam Draxl holds a 48-23 record (67.6%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 353 times, winning 239 (67.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Liam Draxl has posted a 49-29 record (62.8% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Liam Draxl holds a record of 0-3 on hard and 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 181-76 (70.4%) on hard and 46-27 (63.0%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 0-3 on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 32-12 (72.7%) on hard and 4-4 (50.0%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Liam Draxl has won nine titles at Challenger/ITF level (eight on hard and one on clay). Liam Draxl is currently serving 5.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (78 matches), up from a career average of 4.0.

Lukas Neumayer: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Lukas Neumayer holds a 40-26 record (60.6%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 363 times, winning 211 (58.1%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lukas Neumayer has posted a 42-28 record (60.0% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Lukas Neumayer holds a record of 1-3 (25.0%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 178-113 (61.2%) on clay and 29-29 (50.0%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 31-15 (67.4%) on clay and 6-5 (54.5%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Lukas Neumayer has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on clay and one on hard). Lukas Neumayer is currently serving 2.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (70 matches), up from a career average of 2.3.