Tomas Machac vs Vitaliy Sachko Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Tomas Machac and Vitaliy Sachko have met 2 times in professional competition, with Vitaliy Sachko leading 2-0. Their most recent encounter was in July 2023 at Iasi Challenger, where Vitaliy Sachko prevailed on clay court 6-7(5) 6-4 3-0.

Tomas Machac: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Tomas Machac holds a 2-4 record (33.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 289 times, winning 200 (69.2%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Tomas Machac has posted a 19-18 record (51.4% win rate). His last match was 3 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Tomas Machac holds a record of 54-42 (56.2%) on hard, 18-16 (52.9%) on clay, and 4-5 (44.4%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 12-12 (50.0%) on hard, 6-5 (54.5%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at ATP level. Tomas Machac has won two ATP tour-level titles both on hard. He has also won nine titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Tomas Machac is currently serving 5.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (37 matches), up from a career average of 4.8.

Vitaliy Sachko: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Vitaliy Sachko holds a 1-2 record (33.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 10 times, winning 2 (20.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Vitaliy Sachko has posted a 26-31 record (45.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Vitaliy Sachko holds a record of 3-4 (42.9%) on hard and 0-4 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 152-132 (53.5%) on clay and 96-74 (56.5%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 3-1 (75.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 16-12 (57.1%) on clay and 2-6 (25.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Vitaliy Sachko has won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (two on clay and one on hard). Vitaliy Sachko is currently serving 3.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (57 matches), up from a career average of 3.2.