Kamil Majchrzak vs Vitaliy Sachko Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Kamil Majchrzak and Vitaliy Sachko have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Kamil Majchrzak: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Kamil Majchrzak holds a 14-7 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 557 times, winning 378 (67.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Kamil Majchrzak has posted a 34-23 record (59.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Kamil Majchrzak holds a record of 29-32 (47.5%) on hard, 10-7 (58.8%) on grass, and 9-16 (36.0%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 13-12 (52.0%) on hard, 8-2 (80.0%) on grass, and 2-5 (28.6%) on clay at ATP level. Kamil Majchrzak has won one ATP tour-level title on grass. He has also won 20 titles at Challenger/ITF level (12 on clay and eight on hard). Kamil Majchrzak is currently serving 6.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (57 matches), up from a career average of 4.8.

Vitaliy Sachko: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Vitaliy Sachko holds a 1-2 record (33.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 10 times, winning 2 (20.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Vitaliy Sachko has posted a 26-31 record (45.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Vitaliy Sachko holds a record of 3-4 (42.9%) on hard and 0-4 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 152-132 (53.5%) on clay and 96-74 (56.5%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 3-1 (75.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 16-12 (57.1%) on clay and 2-6 (25.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Vitaliy Sachko has won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (two on clay and one on hard). Vitaliy Sachko is currently serving 3.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (57 matches), up from a career average of 3.2.